What is the Process? |
|
The object of mediation is to assist the parties
to arrive at a satisfactory solution to their conflict. Of course
some parties may have chosen to instruct a solicitor before the
mediation, others may even be approaching a court hearing, while
a number may have had a hearing adjourned; mediation at any stage
is possible as long as both parties are positive about attempting
to reach a settlement.
Both parties should accept from the outset that
the purpose of dispute resolution is not to achieve a win or triumph
over the other. Both parties may need to reformulate their “must
win” stance with the aim of achieving a suitable or appropriate
settlement.
Mediation resolves disputes fast, it has an extremely
high success rate and is less expensive than the legal fees associated
with litigation. Parties that mediate avoid the uncertainty of decisions
made by the court. |
|
Frequently Asked Questions |
| 1. What normally happens at a mediation? |
Each mediation will obviously differ depending
on the needs of the parties. Usually the parties will attend on
their own, however, you may wish to attend with a friend, family
member or lawyer. The friend, family member, or lawyer may comment
where appropriate. However, if the other party feels uncomfortable,
inhibited, or intimidated by their attendance, s/he may be asked
to remain in another room during any joint discussions.
Before the mediation the mediator should make
contact with both parties, get an outline of the dispute and discuss
whether mediation is suitable for them. The mediator should not
disclose details of the discussion that s/he has had with either
party to the other unless s/he has specific permission to do so.
The mediation usually commences with both parties
meeting with the mediator together and setting out what their aims/objectives
are for the mediation. The parties will then move to separate rooms
and the mediator will see each party individually. At this stage
the parties are able to speak freely about the dispute and consider
any proposals for potential settlement.
It may be that the parties come together at the
end of the mediation and reach an agreement.
|
| 2. What if we don’t reach an agreement? |
It is not always possible to reach an agreement,
particularly on the first occasion. The parties should not see this
as a failure. Mediation is never a failure because the parties will
have shared the desire to settle and will have been able to identify
and clarify areas of dispute. This will ultimately allow them to
move forward at a more proactive pace to resolve the dispute.
Often where there is no final agreement the parties are still able to identify issues that can be agreed and those that remain. This narrowing of issues relieves emotions and reduces costs. Further, if the matter is to continue to court, time is not wasted on irrelevant matters.
Some parties are able to agree what they think is a good settlement but still wish to obtain legal advice. That is, of course, open for you to do.
Some parties are able to agree that a particular thing should be done first (like building a wall, the returning of an item, or an independent assessment of damage) before the mediation can continue. That is also completely appropriate because mediation is sufficiently flexible for you to do this.
|
|
| 3. What if we do reach an agreement? |
|
If you are able to agree a satisfactory resolution
then the mediator will draft Heads of Agreement. This document sets
out clearly what has been agreed between the parties and the terms
upon which settlement has been reached. The document will then be
signed and dated by the parties and the mediator.
If for some reason the agreement is not effected
by either party and the matter is ultimately adjudicated upon by
the courts, a Judge will view this document as a binding agreement.
However, there may be occasions where a party
asks a Judge to ignore the agreement due to some new information
(or existing information subsequently discovered). It is always
an available option for a Judge to permit this. The party who seeks
to renege from the agreement will have to persuade the court that
the new event undermines the agreement to the extent where compliance
would lead to an inequitable outcome.
Ultimately the agreement is a powerful document
that the courts will attempt to give effect to wherever possible.
Therefore, the parties must be clear about the terms of the agreement
before they sign. It is always open to a party to seek legal advice
before signing the agreement if they require. |
|
| |
|
 |